Candidate AL VAZQUEZ (former president of Parker Ridge): (195:29) Announced his candidacy for City Commission District 4, and shared his background and qualifications. Mr. Vazquez has been an amazing leader in his community delivering honesty and purpose to all their issues. My best wishes to Mr. Vazquez as he steps up to serve his hometown.
Mary Margaret Mahon, Northwood Harbor resident WATCHDOG :(198:27) Requested a video regarding the Milwaukee project. (This would be a great video to show on Channel 18.)
Alan Levine, south end resident WATCHDOG: (199:50) Addressed the water plant and monies removed from the water plant revenues and placed into general revenues. He asked for a time line beginning and comprehensive report regarding how we got here. Also requested by Mr. Levine was a comprehensive financial report clearly educating the public about the funds which are being funneled out of our utilities budget and what are they actually paying for. He doesn’t seem to believe they will respond to his request because he wrapped up with the comment that none of his suggestions have ever been addressed. (I know that feeling!)
Patty High south end resident WATCHDOG: (203:01) Shared her research regarding the contributions to the sitting commissioners and how they have voted accordingly. Ms. High has done extensive in-depth research and her findings are very telling. Please watch her 3 minutes of exposure to who is giving and how the elected officials are voting. She has offered her work for anyone to read for themselves. Ms. High has been researching campaign contributions for many years.
David London, downtown resident and community ADVOCATE for social issues:(207:10) Mr. London is a researcher who has continually brought good ideas and information before the commission for their consideration. At this meeting he shared information on the relationship between chlorine and cancer. Mr. London relies heavily on science and facts, two concepts the commission should pay attention to.
Michael Cleveland, Pleasant City resident and WATCHDOG: (211:00) Spoke to the lack of ethics on the City Commission, the new Mural being designed on the old school building in Pleasant City and Merry Place construction problems affecting the neighborhood.
MEETING TIMES ISSUE WAS BROUGHT UP FOR DISCUSSION
Myrna Sossner, Old Northwood WATCHDOG: (215:45) Spoke to the City Commission starting times. She witnessed to the fact that more of the public have asked to change it back to 5:00pm then have asked to start at 3:00pm. She wants to be able to know what her City is doing.
Mary Margaret Mahon, Northwood Harbor resident WATCHDOG: (218:30) She has been a staunch speaker to this issue for months. In her 3 minutes she gave a very clear history to how the meetings have gotten to this point. She rightly identified the double talk and inaction of the dais to address this matter, as well as the fact that the agenda is not always followed.
(The Mayor in excellent lawyer fashion argued the case against changing the meeting from 3:00pm to 5:00pm. She claims that the public is overstating the case...)
Candidate AL VAZQUEZ (former president of Parker Ridge): (229:00) Shared that he knows for a fact that persons in his neighborhood have shared with him, that they would attend meetings if they were held in the evening.
Nancy Sloane Old Northwood Resident WATCHDOG: (229:55) Addressed the way the agenda is compiled. She does not think this
Alan Levine, South end resident WATCHDOG:(230:45) Have effectively taken the interest out of the meeting and Removed the involvement of citizen participation. Feels personally robbed of his right to participate. He believes the public doesn’t bother expressing themselves because the Mayor won’t listen.
Shawn Jackson, north end resident : (233:48 ) Got a headache just listening to the public. He thinks the watchdogs are out of their mind. He thinks this panel (City Commission) has done some of the best things for this City. He thinks they are the best Commissioner.
The meeting then reverted to the Commission for discussion.
Ultimately the meeting time was changed back.
They HEARD US!
(It is still unclear when public comment will be called for; sounds like the public will be able to speak at the end of the meeting... sigh....)
Thursday, January 31, 2008
Wednesday, January 30, 2008
PUBLIC COMMENT Part 1...
There were so many GREAT Public comments, that I want to cover them ALL, so I will do it in two parts.
PART ONE:
Lord’s Place plugged a fund raiser (see my calendar and join our campaign team who will share the sky in the spirt of community.)
Resident gentleman who lives on 36th Street: (Minute Marker: 161:36) Spoke to the Immigration Resource Center being considered for Broadway and 36th St. Please watch this one if you live in the north end. He also identified Comm. Douglas as not being available to attend the neighborhood meeting to speak to this proposal. The Commission was trying to decide on a date for a public hearing
Denise Smith-Barnes /Pinewood Park community advocate and citizen of the north end: (Minute Marker: 164:55) Asked that meeting times be put back to 5:00pm. Spoke to ways we can have neighborhood collaboration and address today’s issues. Issues included code enforcement, crime, youth empowerment and the resource center. Thank you Denise for your steady presence at City Hall watching out and speaking out for our residents.
Downtown Business Owner: (168:38) Spoke to the problems they incur due to mobile vendors, such as lunch trucks. Definitely an issue for the commission to address with a mind to how it impacts local business owners.
Former City Employee with Accounting Dept. in Finance: (172:32) A smart man with wisdom to share...asked that the City consider reverse osmosis as a water plant solution. (I wish they were listening to this message.) Also spoke to a plan for switchblade grass as an environmentally consciences direction the City could go in.
Small business owner struggling with bureaucracy: (175:35) This poor guy was on the verge of tears. Please listen to his frustration. This was suppose to be a three minute comment and turned into a complete side show. The Mayor lost control of the meeting as the dialogue escalated and the audience became aggravated that the public comment time limit was being exceeded. The Commission got antsy, and the Mayor had trouble getting back to order. The "JITNEY JIVE" (my title to this story) was a sad statement of how we do business in the City; ending with the Mayor totally losing her cool.
Want a show?
Tune in to this one.
Landowner wanting to quit claim land to local church: (189:03) Thought our meeting was very entertaining. He lives in Boca. His comment: Ask the City to waive liens on property so he can gift the land to a local church. Sorry, no deal.
ME, CANDIDATE ALEX VIZOSO SAYLOR: (192:06)
Please, if you watch nothing else, watch this.
I announced my candidacy.
In a spirit of civil disclose and example setting, I tried to set the stage for a clean and healthy race.
I couldn’t believe my ears as Commissioner Douglas announced that she did not ...
Well, hear it for yourself!
PLEASE LISTEN TO THE ENTIRE 3 MINUTES.
I also requested a Channel 18 forum for ALL candidates.
We'll see on this one, I have little hope, but I had to ask...
ITS IMPORTANT TO THE FUTURE OF OUR CITY.
Public comment Part Two will follow (to be continued...)
PART ONE:
Lord’s Place plugged a fund raiser (see my calendar and join our campaign team who will share the sky in the spirt of community.)
Resident gentleman who lives on 36th Street: (Minute Marker: 161:36) Spoke to the Immigration Resource Center being considered for Broadway and 36th St. Please watch this one if you live in the north end. He also identified Comm. Douglas as not being available to attend the neighborhood meeting to speak to this proposal. The Commission was trying to decide on a date for a public hearing
Denise Smith-Barnes /Pinewood Park community advocate and citizen of the north end: (Minute Marker: 164:55) Asked that meeting times be put back to 5:00pm. Spoke to ways we can have neighborhood collaboration and address today’s issues. Issues included code enforcement, crime, youth empowerment and the resource center. Thank you Denise for your steady presence at City Hall watching out and speaking out for our residents.
Downtown Business Owner: (168:38) Spoke to the problems they incur due to mobile vendors, such as lunch trucks. Definitely an issue for the commission to address with a mind to how it impacts local business owners.
Former City Employee with Accounting Dept. in Finance: (172:32) A smart man with wisdom to share...asked that the City consider reverse osmosis as a water plant solution. (I wish they were listening to this message.) Also spoke to a plan for switchblade grass as an environmentally consciences direction the City could go in.
Small business owner struggling with bureaucracy: (175:35) This poor guy was on the verge of tears. Please listen to his frustration. This was suppose to be a three minute comment and turned into a complete side show. The Mayor lost control of the meeting as the dialogue escalated and the audience became aggravated that the public comment time limit was being exceeded. The Commission got antsy, and the Mayor had trouble getting back to order. The "JITNEY JIVE" (my title to this story) was a sad statement of how we do business in the City; ending with the Mayor totally losing her cool.
Want a show?
Tune in to this one.
Landowner wanting to quit claim land to local church: (189:03) Thought our meeting was very entertaining. He lives in Boca. His comment: Ask the City to waive liens on property so he can gift the land to a local church. Sorry, no deal.
ME, CANDIDATE ALEX VIZOSO SAYLOR: (192:06)
Please, if you watch nothing else, watch this.
I announced my candidacy.
In a spirit of civil disclose and example setting, I tried to set the stage for a clean and healthy race.
I couldn’t believe my ears as Commissioner Douglas announced that she did not ...
Well, hear it for yourself!
PLEASE LISTEN TO THE ENTIRE 3 MINUTES.
I also requested a Channel 18 forum for ALL candidates.
We'll see on this one, I have little hope, but I had to ask...
ITS IMPORTANT TO THE FUTURE OF OUR CITY.
Public comment Part Two will follow (to be continued...)
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
City Commission Meeting , January 28, 2008
Last night’s City Commission Meeting is worthy of a viewing.
For those that missed it live, please watch it on the City’s web site, the link is highlighted above. View: January 28, 2008.
It was 5 hours long, so I am going give a "reader’s digest’ version, with highlights, and attention given later to public comment, (which most agreed was the best part).
Before I begin, I wish to clarify something that happened to me when I spoke to the issue of the REVISED construction services resolution.
I opened my statement (minute marker 48:00) with the acknowledgment that at Agenda Review (held on the Thursday before City Commission), I noticed this particular item was NOT on the agenda.. Upon stating my observation, most on the dais quickly stated that it had been on the agenda and discussed.
(Okay, I arrived a tiny bit late, so maybe they did talk about it:
but I distinctly remember not seeing it on the DRAFT agenda being reviewed on Thursday.)
So I was surprised when the City’s Attorney and Assistant Administratoras as well as some Commissioners, were so quick to make me wrong.
In my defense I present the public with these facts:
The DRAFT agenda is posted on the City’s web site, please look at it yourselves and tell me if there is something I missed.
(I have the original DRAFT so if it changed I have the original for others to see.)
When compared to the ACTUAL agenda present at this meeting, there seems to have been a few changes.
I consider myself very observant and hate when I am told I didn’t see or hear something I am sure I heard or saw.
There was a lot of that going on last night!
Alas, we have the recorded playback for honest verification!
So, here is the condensed version of last night’s meeting:
Construction Services (Item 20): revised the resolution with a time line which had been determined by a "task force" of three. Its important to know that these are NOT the recommendations of staff. I got the distinct impression that staff did not support these changes. Mayor Frankel rightly warned that there is a consultant who will be coming in to advise us as to whether these time lines are attainable, so perhaps they (the Commission) should wait. Commissioner Douglas though is on a mission!
Get this through NOW!
Let’s remember, she has an election coming up and as she stated at a previous meeting she "wrote" this report.
Changes to the Type III overlay of the original Northwood Mixed Used District (N-MUD): Requested by the CRA,, this yet again alters the predictability which the N-MUD (originally crafted by residents who live in the area) was intended to provide.
Moved by Comm. Douglas for approval.
So much for predictability...
So now for the most interesting portions of the meeting...Public Comment...
(Minute Marker 156)
For those that missed it live, please watch it on the City’s web site, the link is highlighted above. View: January 28, 2008.
It was 5 hours long, so I am going give a "reader’s digest’ version, with highlights, and attention given later to public comment, (which most agreed was the best part).
Before I begin, I wish to clarify something that happened to me when I spoke to the issue of the REVISED construction services resolution.
I opened my statement (minute marker 48:00) with the acknowledgment that at Agenda Review (held on the Thursday before City Commission), I noticed this particular item was NOT on the agenda.. Upon stating my observation, most on the dais quickly stated that it had been on the agenda and discussed.
(Okay, I arrived a tiny bit late, so maybe they did talk about it:
but I distinctly remember not seeing it on the DRAFT agenda being reviewed on Thursday.)
So I was surprised when the City’s Attorney and Assistant Administratoras as well as some Commissioners, were so quick to make me wrong.
In my defense I present the public with these facts:
The DRAFT agenda is posted on the City’s web site, please look at it yourselves and tell me if there is something I missed.
(I have the original DRAFT so if it changed I have the original for others to see.)
When compared to the ACTUAL agenda present at this meeting, there seems to have been a few changes.
I consider myself very observant and hate when I am told I didn’t see or hear something I am sure I heard or saw.
There was a lot of that going on last night!
Alas, we have the recorded playback for honest verification!
So, here is the condensed version of last night’s meeting:
Construction Services (Item 20): revised the resolution with a time line which had been determined by a "task force" of three. Its important to know that these are NOT the recommendations of staff. I got the distinct impression that staff did not support these changes. Mayor Frankel rightly warned that there is a consultant who will be coming in to advise us as to whether these time lines are attainable, so perhaps they (the Commission) should wait. Commissioner Douglas though is on a mission!
Get this through NOW!
Let’s remember, she has an election coming up and as she stated at a previous meeting she "wrote" this report.
Changes to the Type III overlay of the original Northwood Mixed Used District (N-MUD): Requested by the CRA,, this yet again alters the predictability which the N-MUD (originally crafted by residents who live in the area) was intended to provide.
Moved by Comm. Douglas for approval.
So much for predictability...
So now for the most interesting portions of the meeting...Public Comment...
(Minute Marker 156)
Sunday, January 27, 2008
POWER AND ETHICS
The allure of "power" has a corrupting influence.
Power in and of itself is not corruptive.
It is when power has no balance that it can take missteps.
We strive for balance in our daily routines.
In our diet, our finances, our time,we always carefully work towards balance.
In our personal lives we strive to acheive healthy balances.
On our City Commission, the checks and balances have been compromised for some in their quest for power. Therefore, let us be careful, when we vote for elected officials who are willing to find "consensus", that they do not compromise their principles in the ultimate search for agreement. The inner motives or "inner voice" should always be free from personal gain or directive.
It is the public who matters.
Both the neighborhoods and the business community should be seated at all tables of dialogue. I believe that government should play the role of a bridge between the two.
A symbiotic relationship must exist if we are to prosper together.
Today that bridge feels like its been blown apart and the influence lies with those who can pay for it.
My suggestion is that we, the voters, find the fair and balanced person we wish to represent us.
Balance in our life is essential to our health.
Balance in our government is required for a prosperous and growing City.
We love this City, so let’s treat ALL who live or work here with respect.
Let’s put civility back into our hearts and demonstrate balance in our decisions.
I implore our politicians, and candidates, to heal the broken trust that currently exist in the hearts and minds of the stakeholders of West Palm Beach.
This election is a chance to show we are civil and can speak to issues not personalities.
We can be examples of leadership, by demonstrating ethics in how we run in this race.
Many have heard the quote:
"Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely."
Lord Acton
There is another quote which can replace this one today:
"I've learned that whenever I decide something with an open heart,
I usually make the right decision."
Maya Angelou
Power in and of itself is not corruptive.
It is when power has no balance that it can take missteps.
We strive for balance in our daily routines.
In our diet, our finances, our time,we always carefully work towards balance.
In our personal lives we strive to acheive healthy balances.
On our City Commission, the checks and balances have been compromised for some in their quest for power. Therefore, let us be careful, when we vote for elected officials who are willing to find "consensus", that they do not compromise their principles in the ultimate search for agreement. The inner motives or "inner voice" should always be free from personal gain or directive.
It is the public who matters.
Both the neighborhoods and the business community should be seated at all tables of dialogue. I believe that government should play the role of a bridge between the two.
A symbiotic relationship must exist if we are to prosper together.
Today that bridge feels like its been blown apart and the influence lies with those who can pay for it.
My suggestion is that we, the voters, find the fair and balanced person we wish to represent us.
Balance in our life is essential to our health.
Balance in our government is required for a prosperous and growing City.
We love this City, so let’s treat ALL who live or work here with respect.
Let’s put civility back into our hearts and demonstrate balance in our decisions.
I implore our politicians, and candidates, to heal the broken trust that currently exist in the hearts and minds of the stakeholders of West Palm Beach.
This election is a chance to show we are civil and can speak to issues not personalities.
We can be examples of leadership, by demonstrating ethics in how we run in this race.
Many have heard the quote:
"Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely."
Lord Acton
There is another quote which can replace this one today:
"I've learned that whenever I decide something with an open heart,
I usually make the right decision."
Maya Angelou
MONEY AND ETHICS...
Try as we might, we cannot legislate ethics.
Those who lack the moral fiber to “respect right and wrong actions” or “goodness and badness of motives” will face the same choices regardless of what law is created.
My suggestion is this:
Campaign reform and aid could be a tool for limiting the influence peddling that is so intrenched in politics.
Channel 18 is a publicly paid television station that the City currently spends close to half a million dollars on.
Why not use it to educate the residents on an equal basis of ALL candidates and their positions.
I can think of no higher purpose then to share this outlet for the betterment of the electorate at the polls.
It could be one resource for fair exposure, therefore eliminating the need to raise vast amounts of money (hence minimizing the “taking money from lobbyist or developers”).
It would allow for a clean and fair venue for candidates to “get their message out”.
If we recognize that there does not need to be such a gluttony of media or glossy fliers in the mailbox to reach the voters, then we can alter the amount of money needed to run a campaign.
This at least begins to address ina small way, one area of the “money” portion of corruption.
Those who lack the moral fiber to “respect right and wrong actions” or “goodness and badness of motives” will face the same choices regardless of what law is created.
My suggestion is this:
Campaign reform and aid could be a tool for limiting the influence peddling that is so intrenched in politics.
Channel 18 is a publicly paid television station that the City currently spends close to half a million dollars on.
Why not use it to educate the residents on an equal basis of ALL candidates and their positions.
I can think of no higher purpose then to share this outlet for the betterment of the electorate at the polls.
It could be one resource for fair exposure, therefore eliminating the need to raise vast amounts of money (hence minimizing the “taking money from lobbyist or developers”).
It would allow for a clean and fair venue for candidates to “get their message out”.
If we recognize that there does not need to be such a gluttony of media or glossy fliers in the mailbox to reach the voters, then we can alter the amount of money needed to run a campaign.
This at least begins to address ina small way, one area of the “money” portion of corruption.
The Definition of ETHICS:
As I knocked on doors and spoke to many of our area residents, I was touched by the love we all share for this City. Many have families and want to grow those hearts and minds of our future here. Others, have lived here for generations. The underlying commonality was their desire to live in a safe and healthy environment. They don’t want to worry that government is making the wrong choice, setting the wrong example or spending their taxes foolishly.
Corruption in our local government has undermined those desires.
I listened to a long-time resident in Northwood Harbor, who has lived here for over 60 years. She recently shared with me that her father (a former local politician) only served one term because he could not bear the nastiness of government.
In Flamingo Park, a single mother, who referred to politics as the "cesspool of society."
Yesterday, once again, a gentleman in the South End of the City, shared these thoughts with me: "When my father was in the House of Representatives, taking money from lobbyist or developers was not considered a bribe or a bad thing. It was a necessity to running a campaign, but it didn’t get you preferential treatment."
All these statements came from residents who have lived here for many years.
Each one expressed their views and dissatisfaction for the current wave of ugliness we have witnessed these last 2 years.
Two County commissioners and two City commissioners, plus a prominent attorney, have breached the public trust.
Two Grand Jury reports highlight perceptions, which we can all agree, are not healthy for any city.
If we try to understand the why and how’s of corruption, it ultimately will lead us back to two words: Money and Power.
Look up the definition of Ethics and we will find this:
"A set of principles of right conduct."
American Heritage Dictionary
Or this definition (clearly identifies the human ability of choice in ethics):
"that branch of philosophy dealing with values relating to human conduct, with respect to the rightness and wrongness of certain actions and to the goodness and badness of the motives and ends of such actions."
So how do we try to inject ethics into government when ethics are defined as a system of moral principles? What are your thoughts regarding this question?
I have some ideas...
Corruption in our local government has undermined those desires.
I listened to a long-time resident in Northwood Harbor, who has lived here for over 60 years. She recently shared with me that her father (a former local politician) only served one term because he could not bear the nastiness of government.
In Flamingo Park, a single mother, who referred to politics as the "cesspool of society."
Yesterday, once again, a gentleman in the South End of the City, shared these thoughts with me: "When my father was in the House of Representatives, taking money from lobbyist or developers was not considered a bribe or a bad thing. It was a necessity to running a campaign, but it didn’t get you preferential treatment."
All these statements came from residents who have lived here for many years.
Each one expressed their views and dissatisfaction for the current wave of ugliness we have witnessed these last 2 years.
Two County commissioners and two City commissioners, plus a prominent attorney, have breached the public trust.
Two Grand Jury reports highlight perceptions, which we can all agree, are not healthy for any city.
If we try to understand the why and how’s of corruption, it ultimately will lead us back to two words: Money and Power.
Look up the definition of Ethics and we will find this:
"A set of principles of right conduct."
American Heritage Dictionary
Or this definition (clearly identifies the human ability of choice in ethics):
"that branch of philosophy dealing with values relating to human conduct, with respect to the rightness and wrongness of certain actions and to the goodness and badness of the motives and ends of such actions."
So how do we try to inject ethics into government when ethics are defined as a system of moral principles? What are your thoughts regarding this question?
I have some ideas...
Saturday, January 26, 2008
Leaky Copper Pipe Problems Contact...
As I walk the neighborhoods, I am told of other homes which are experiencing copper pipe water leaks.
I see the lines dredged up, sometimes under driveways, sometimes through gardens. I do not ask to enter their homes to see the interior damages, but believe them when I am told of the thousands of dollars in repairs they must make.
It is in an effort to provide a clearinghouse for sharing information that I have asked a north end resident to champion this cause. As someone who has personally been battling the problems (which appear to have a common cause) Mr. John Sewell has agreed to be a collector of names and addresses for a database of leaky pipe households.
Residents in the City thank him for his willingness to step up, to give of his time and energy, and being a clearinghouse for information and solutions.
If you, or someone you know has had a similar problem as those that have been reported in the Palm Beach Daily Newspaper , (2nd article in Shiny Sheet),Palm Beach Post or News Channel 5 WPTV, please email him with your story, name and address. Click on his name above to send Mr. Sewell an email. Any information that is sent to my email will be forwarded to Mr. Sewell.
Thank you Mr. Sewell for serving our community as a clearhouse for others who are experiencing the same issues you have been dealing with for months.
I see the lines dredged up, sometimes under driveways, sometimes through gardens. I do not ask to enter their homes to see the interior damages, but believe them when I am told of the thousands of dollars in repairs they must make.
It is in an effort to provide a clearinghouse for sharing information that I have asked a north end resident to champion this cause. As someone who has personally been battling the problems (which appear to have a common cause) Mr. John Sewell has agreed to be a collector of names and addresses for a database of leaky pipe households.
Residents in the City thank him for his willingness to step up, to give of his time and energy, and being a clearinghouse for information and solutions.
If you, or someone you know has had a similar problem as those that have been reported in the Palm Beach Daily Newspaper , (2nd article in Shiny Sheet),Palm Beach Post or News Channel 5 WPTV, please email him with your story, name and address. Click on his name above to send Mr. Sewell an email. Any information that is sent to my email will be forwarded to Mr. Sewell.
Thank you Mr. Sewell for serving our community as a clearhouse for others who are experiencing the same issues you have been dealing with for months.
Friday, January 25, 2008
The Knowledge Factor...
The knowledge factor often holds a challenger at a disadvantage.
Not in this election.
My knowledge base reaches back 44 years in this City, (longer when I talk to our elders).
I remember when the children of West Palm Beach had bowling alleys, skating rinks, and sidewalks to play on.
I remember a time when we could sleep with our windows open.
I remember parks as a safe place to go, they were our extended backyards . . .
Having grown up in West Palm Beach provides me with a strong sense of history, as well as ties to our community.
Over the years, I have seen how our government has changed course each time we have changed Mayors.
With you, I have lived through the good, the bad and the ugly.
Over the last nine years I have attended as many or more public meetings as our elected officials have. (Even the Mayor has admitted to this fact.)
Often I have felt that I know more then they do about certain issues.
I know how City Hall operates.
I know the problems we face and how we got here.
I understand the heart and soul of the residents of West Palm Beach; the newcomers and the old-timers.
Let's ask our elected leaders to provide us with the platform to debate, or simply discuss our difference on Channel 18.
It is the public information channel for the residents of the City of West Palm Beach.
Lately it has become a venue of propaganda and slanted information.
Of course I expect they will not...power can determine many things, including the exclusion of information.
Join me in my request that the dais provide essential education to our electorate.
Rather then the exercise classes and cooking demonstrations, let’s use our tax dollars to truly inform and educate the residents on matters of great importance.
Making an informed decision on March 11th is essential to the process.
Email or call the Commissioners and the Mayor to let them know how you feel.
Let the public decide who has the knowledge to lead us to prosperity.
We must know where we have been,
to understand where we must go.
Not in this election.
My knowledge base reaches back 44 years in this City, (longer when I talk to our elders).
I remember when the children of West Palm Beach had bowling alleys, skating rinks, and sidewalks to play on.
I remember a time when we could sleep with our windows open.
I remember parks as a safe place to go, they were our extended backyards . . .
Having grown up in West Palm Beach provides me with a strong sense of history, as well as ties to our community.
Over the years, I have seen how our government has changed course each time we have changed Mayors.
With you, I have lived through the good, the bad and the ugly.
Over the last nine years I have attended as many or more public meetings as our elected officials have. (Even the Mayor has admitted to this fact.)
Often I have felt that I know more then they do about certain issues.
I know how City Hall operates.
I know the problems we face and how we got here.
I understand the heart and soul of the residents of West Palm Beach; the newcomers and the old-timers.
Let's ask our elected leaders to provide us with the platform to debate, or simply discuss our difference on Channel 18.
It is the public information channel for the residents of the City of West Palm Beach.
Lately it has become a venue of propaganda and slanted information.
Of course I expect they will not...power can determine many things, including the exclusion of information.
Join me in my request that the dais provide essential education to our electorate.
Rather then the exercise classes and cooking demonstrations, let’s use our tax dollars to truly inform and educate the residents on matters of great importance.
Making an informed decision on March 11th is essential to the process.
Email or call the Commissioners and the Mayor to let them know how you feel.
Let the public decide who has the knowledge to lead us to prosperity.
We must know where we have been,
to understand where we must go.
People are afraid of change...
It’s the safety factor...
people are afraid of change...
like the "abused housewife" who won’t leave her husband...
a sick syndrome of self destruction.
Not today!
Today in government, I believe this is being challenged, not only locally, but nationally as well.
I hear everyone say, "We need change, and we need it now."
I agree we need change in many areas.
We need to change many things.
On March 11th your vote can change everything.
Let’s change the way we do business as a government body.
Let’s restore civility to government.
Let’s put back the checks and balances which have been absent from the dais
Let’s put a stop to the manipulation and intellectual dishonesty of how and why they arrive at their voting decisions.
Let’s stop the "get along to go along" mentality currently on the Commission.
Let’s stop the "horse-trading" of votes. This is a form of corrupt government.
Let’s put principle back in the vote and replace the "scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours" relationships.
It can start with electing me for City Commission on March 11th.
Share the spirit of change with your family and friends.
We can CHANGE the face of our local government if we vote for a change.
people are afraid of change...
like the "abused housewife" who won’t leave her husband...
a sick syndrome of self destruction.
Not today!
Today in government, I believe this is being challenged, not only locally, but nationally as well.
I hear everyone say, "We need change, and we need it now."
I agree we need change in many areas.
We need to change many things.
On March 11th your vote can change everything.
Let’s change the way we do business as a government body.
Let’s restore civility to government.
Let’s put back the checks and balances which have been absent from the dais
Let’s put a stop to the manipulation and intellectual dishonesty of how and why they arrive at their voting decisions.
Let’s stop the "get along to go along" mentality currently on the Commission.
Let’s stop the "horse-trading" of votes. This is a form of corrupt government.
Let’s put principle back in the vote and replace the "scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours" relationships.
It can start with electing me for City Commission on March 11th.
Share the spirit of change with your family and friends.
We can CHANGE the face of our local government if we vote for a change.
Its the NAME RECOGNITION thing...
Name recognition is vital in any election.
Incumbents are in the public realm with their names and faces before us, whether for good reasons or bad. The imprint it leaves follows them to the poll.
Whether the voter knows the facts about the incumbents voting record or not, they will recognize the familiar tone and sound of the name. This administration has used public dollars to promote their name and face recognition. Just recently there was a flyer for a northend event and my opponent was featured on the front cover. I believe this is wrong. (But no worries here.)
Why am I not worried?
This is my hometown.
My name and face has also been in the public realm of our City's government for 9 years at public meetings and 44 years in this City as an active volunteer and business woman in the community.
I am counting on the ‘word of mouth factor' to win this election and represent you on the dais.
It is your recommendation to other neighbors and voters that will speak louder then any glossy flier delivered to your mailbox.
I am asking that you... please be my voice.
Please share the need for change within our City Hall walls with your neighbors.
We must start to dialogue amongst ourselves for change to occur.
Incumbents are in the public realm with their names and faces before us, whether for good reasons or bad. The imprint it leaves follows them to the poll.
Whether the voter knows the facts about the incumbents voting record or not, they will recognize the familiar tone and sound of the name. This administration has used public dollars to promote their name and face recognition. Just recently there was a flyer for a northend event and my opponent was featured on the front cover. I believe this is wrong. (But no worries here.)
Why am I not worried?
This is my hometown.
My name and face has also been in the public realm of our City's government for 9 years at public meetings and 44 years in this City as an active volunteer and business woman in the community.
I am counting on the ‘word of mouth factor' to win this election and represent you on the dais.
It is your recommendation to other neighbors and voters that will speak louder then any glossy flier delivered to your mailbox.
I am asking that you... please be my voice.
Please share the need for change within our City Hall walls with your neighbors.
We must start to dialogue amongst ourselves for change to occur.
Thursday, January 24, 2008
Mayor/Commission Workshop January 22
Can I hear a hallelujah?
We finally got to witness a really good meeting between Commissioners.
The dialogue covered important matters, as well as other subjects which had been brought up by the communities as important matters to them.
Must be an election year...
Commissioner Geri Muoio who is NOT up for re-election gets the biggest Gold Star for bringing up the City Commission meeting times. Seems she really does want to discuss changing this back. The Commission however thought they should wait for Mayor Frankel’s return. (Seems the Mayor, was in Washington "dialing for dollars" according to Commissioner Douglas.)
I find it disturbing that it took them less time to change it to an inconvenient time for residents, then it has for them to change it back. How much work-shopping and talking does it take to realize THIS POLICY IS NOT GOOD GOVERNMENT?
Commissioner Bill Moss brought up a subject which was heard at the SENA (South End Neighborhood Association) meeting, pertaining to 24 hour pharmacies and the undesirable element that gathers there late at night. The neighborhood leaders asked that an ordinance be considered. Incidents of residents being accosted in the parking lot have occurred. So let’s all say thank you Commissioner Moss, you’re listening. Commissioner Moss is being challenged by community advocate and Parker Ridge President Al Vazquez. (Congratulations Al Vazquez for stepping up to serve our City.)
Commissioner Ike Robinson gets an honorable mention, for correctly insisting that public participation regarding a zoning issue pertinent to a Temporary Labor Resource Center on 37th Street, should be taken to the residents who live in the adjacent areas. The Labor Resource Center is a much needed facility, which will house the current population that now gathers on Broadway to wait for employers to offer them work. The problem seems to be one of zoning, although Commissioner Moss seemed to think it was one of semantics. Take out the word labor or hiring and it’s a go!
Commissioner Kimberly Mitchell discussed geo-plasma waste to energy sites as a subject that deserves serious attention. I fully concurr! I am not surprised that it came from our most forward thinking commissioner. She always brings good ideas to the Commission. ...Commissioner Mitchell is also up for re-election. She deserves to keep her seat. Let's hope the public is listening.
There were other interesting items discussed which can be viewed as a rerun on Channel 18.
This meeting is a good example of how commissioner’s should be talking to each other.
Nothing like an election to get them to do their job!
We finally got to witness a really good meeting between Commissioners.
The dialogue covered important matters, as well as other subjects which had been brought up by the communities as important matters to them.
Must be an election year...
Commissioner Geri Muoio who is NOT up for re-election gets the biggest Gold Star for bringing up the City Commission meeting times. Seems she really does want to discuss changing this back. The Commission however thought they should wait for Mayor Frankel’s return. (Seems the Mayor, was in Washington "dialing for dollars" according to Commissioner Douglas.)
I find it disturbing that it took them less time to change it to an inconvenient time for residents, then it has for them to change it back. How much work-shopping and talking does it take to realize THIS POLICY IS NOT GOOD GOVERNMENT?
Commissioner Bill Moss brought up a subject which was heard at the SENA (South End Neighborhood Association) meeting, pertaining to 24 hour pharmacies and the undesirable element that gathers there late at night. The neighborhood leaders asked that an ordinance be considered. Incidents of residents being accosted in the parking lot have occurred. So let’s all say thank you Commissioner Moss, you’re listening. Commissioner Moss is being challenged by community advocate and Parker Ridge President Al Vazquez. (Congratulations Al Vazquez for stepping up to serve our City.)
Commissioner Ike Robinson gets an honorable mention, for correctly insisting that public participation regarding a zoning issue pertinent to a Temporary Labor Resource Center on 37th Street, should be taken to the residents who live in the adjacent areas. The Labor Resource Center is a much needed facility, which will house the current population that now gathers on Broadway to wait for employers to offer them work. The problem seems to be one of zoning, although Commissioner Moss seemed to think it was one of semantics. Take out the word labor or hiring and it’s a go!
Commissioner Kimberly Mitchell discussed geo-plasma waste to energy sites as a subject that deserves serious attention. I fully concurr! I am not surprised that it came from our most forward thinking commissioner. She always brings good ideas to the Commission. ...Commissioner Mitchell is also up for re-election. She deserves to keep her seat. Let's hope the public is listening.
There were other interesting items discussed which can be viewed as a rerun on Channel 18.
This meeting is a good example of how commissioner’s should be talking to each other.
Nothing like an election to get them to do their job!
SO WHERE IS THE BUDGET LEADING US?
Hopefully you have taken the time to read the Budget Narrative and gleamed interesting bits of information from it.
Its nice to know that its "THE CITIZENS OF WEST PALM BEACH" top the Organizational Chart .At least here, we have clear identifying chains of command,... we have it in writing.
So as the BOSS we should have an awareness of how our taxes are being spent and what other monies are used to operate the City of West Palm Beach. I suggest, for those interested in the nitty gritty of numbers, to go directly to page 67. The finance department has done a good job of explaining the various departments and funds.
I wanted to see for myself how the past department budgets compared with this one.
So I have done my own comparison.
In a department by department comparison over the last 5 years, I have charted the steady increase of the Department Expenditures: Total Reports.
It is very telling. To give just a few examples:
Mayor’s Department in 2002 was $595,110.00.
This budget is $1,304,245.00
Channel 18 in 2002 wasn’t actually budgeted, but spent $81,531. 00.
Today they are budgeted for $477,952.
General Government was $17,273,197.00 in 2002.
Today’s budget, $41,240,533.00
City Attorney in 2002 was $1,732,799.00.
This budget shows $2,874,787.00
There’s more. But I won’t bore you.
I will encourage each of you to do your own research.
All the budgets are online.
Check it out.
There are gross increases in line items which I have identified as bloat.
We must get educated as to how they are allocating our taxes, as well as, how they are compromising our future with the debt of bonds.
Anyone who is interested in seeing my entire chart can reach me by email and we can arrange a visit for you to see how the numbers have grown.
Its nice to know that its "THE CITIZENS OF WEST PALM BEACH" top the Organizational Chart .At least here, we have clear identifying chains of command,... we have it in writing.
So as the BOSS we should have an awareness of how our taxes are being spent and what other monies are used to operate the City of West Palm Beach. I suggest, for those interested in the nitty gritty of numbers, to go directly to page 67. The finance department has done a good job of explaining the various departments and funds.
I wanted to see for myself how the past department budgets compared with this one.
So I have done my own comparison.
In a department by department comparison over the last 5 years, I have charted the steady increase of the Department Expenditures: Total Reports.
It is very telling. To give just a few examples:
Mayor’s Department in 2002 was $595,110.00.
This budget is $1,304,245.00
Channel 18 in 2002 wasn’t actually budgeted, but spent $81,531. 00.
Today they are budgeted for $477,952.
General Government was $17,273,197.00 in 2002.
Today’s budget, $41,240,533.00
City Attorney in 2002 was $1,732,799.00.
This budget shows $2,874,787.00
There’s more. But I won’t bore you.
I will encourage each of you to do your own research.
All the budgets are online.
Check it out.
There are gross increases in line items which I have identified as bloat.
We must get educated as to how they are allocating our taxes, as well as, how they are compromising our future with the debt of bonds.
Anyone who is interested in seeing my entire chart can reach me by email and we can arrange a visit for you to see how the numbers have grown.
Tuesday, January 22, 2008
A Windy Rainy Day...but I still knocked on doors.
Yesterday was Martin Luther King Jr. Day.
Several celebrations and events were held; at which I am sure many politicians made their appearances to glad hand and promote their interest in the civil rights movement.
Me?
I decided to used my civil liberties and walk door to door with my campaign material as an expression of our freedom of speech and right to vote.
I am indebted to Dr. King’s advocacy.
I am inspired by the power of people when we recognize we do have the ability to move mountains.
I am awed by great leadership.
In this City I am proud of all the local advocates we have in our community.
If it were not for their examples of leadership, we would all be simply herded into one train of thought.
As I have been heard to say, anyone can lead, but we must be sure we agree with the direction or path we are being led on.
Leadership has very clear mandates.
It finds its voice within the membership.
Good leaders recognize the needs and desires of those they serve.
They LEAD them to resolve those needs and desires.
Good leaders are just.
They recognize that they serve not only those that agree, but those that disagree as well.
To find the talents in ALL people and employ them for the betterment of community is essential to good leadership.
Recognizing the highest and best purpose of their power, in the simple act of voting, is critical to being a good city commissioner.
Several celebrations and events were held; at which I am sure many politicians made their appearances to glad hand and promote their interest in the civil rights movement.
Me?
I decided to used my civil liberties and walk door to door with my campaign material as an expression of our freedom of speech and right to vote.
I am indebted to Dr. King’s advocacy.
I am inspired by the power of people when we recognize we do have the ability to move mountains.
I am awed by great leadership.
In this City I am proud of all the local advocates we have in our community.
If it were not for their examples of leadership, we would all be simply herded into one train of thought.
As I have been heard to say, anyone can lead, but we must be sure we agree with the direction or path we are being led on.
Leadership has very clear mandates.
It finds its voice within the membership.
Good leaders recognize the needs and desires of those they serve.
They LEAD them to resolve those needs and desires.
Good leaders are just.
They recognize that they serve not only those that agree, but those that disagree as well.
To find the talents in ALL people and employ them for the betterment of community is essential to good leadership.
Recognizing the highest and best purpose of their power, in the simple act of voting, is critical to being a good city commissioner.
I have a history on the record as to where I have stood, time and time again, before the City Commission with my perspective and suggestions.
They listen, but they do not hear.
They may feign agreement, but they vote in the other direction.
The talk just doesn’t match the vote.
Recently an issue regarding adding 2 extra stories to an apartment building came up for a vote.
The dialogue from the developer was simple... we can’t afford to build this project without the extra floors. (Well, didn’t you do your homework before you bought the property? Doesn’t sound like good business to me if you didn’t.)
Commissioner Kimberly Mitchell asked a series of very good questions.
What’s the trade off here?
What does the community get in return for allowing MORE density?
What is the greater good or purpose served to the residents if we allow the extra profit margin to the developer?
I encourage all of you to watch the meeting and the discussion had by the commissioners. Then you decide if they exhibited good leadership.
View: January 14, 2008 The issue I am referring to began at minute marker 55.00
(My comments are on minute marker 105.02.)
Commissioner Mitchell moved to NOT APPROVE the added height. There was NO second from her four other commissioners.
It is very telling who they were serving and where they are leading us.We are warned by history if we value prosperity over justice, we’ll end up losing both.
In the City today we have great needs.
We need clean water.
We need less crime.
We need lower taxes.
We desire GREAT LEADERS.
The question will be asked March 11th.
Who do you want to lead you?
I respectfully ask for your endorsement of my candidacy, and hope I’ve earned your trust that...
I can lead us in the right direction.
"Great necessities call forth great leaders." Abigail Adams, wife of President John Adams 1764
Monday, January 21, 2008
"ALEX'S"BUDGET NARRATIVE REVIEW
I ended up reading the Budget Narrative indoors because the brisk cool weather I was enjoying on the St. John’s River turned bitter cold. We returned home to find West Palm Beach had suffered from a cold wind blowing through as well...
Here’s the Budget Narrative as recently posted online.
If you want to read along with me, maybe we can compare notes?
Please send me an email with your thoughts.
There’s a lot of great information here (ALL 315 pages are must read) and I encourage you all to take a peek.
For those of you who prefer cliff notes, I will try to provide the highlights.
For most of this week I will be speaking to the budget, because that’s where the story should always begin.
The Finance Department has done a superb job with clearly stating the facts.
I appreciate their professionalism, courtesy and accuracy.
Anytime I have had a question, they have responded quickly and clearly.
So where should we begin?
First a few "DID YOU KNOW" facts directly from the Budget Narrative Message
(my comments will be in red and if you read the budget as we go through this, the first excepts begin on page 3):
"The FY 2008 budget reflects the recent changes in legislative actions which required the City to roll-back taxes. Property tax revenues within the City’s General Fund decreased $2.4 million, along with expenditure increases; the City faced a $6 million shortfall."
"Property Values within the City did not increase in the double-digit range of recent years – an indication of the City’s economic condition, as well as throughout the state. ... The Property Appraiser is projecting a decline in value of 4% in existing values, which may constrain future budgets."
"The operating millage rate for FY 2008 decreased .6584 mills to 7.1916 mills. The debt service millage rate for FY 2008 is .2967 mills and funds the debt service associated with the City’s general obligation bonds. The total City millage rate for FY 2008 is 7.4883 mills, which is the lowest in almost two decades.."
Outlook :if you don’t read any other part of this report, you owe it to yourself to read the OUTLOOK (Pg. 5 & 6)
The total FY 2008 Budget for all funds is $359,506,336 with the breakdown by fund type as follows:
General Fund: $187,139,761
Special Revenue Funds: 18,538,074
Debt Service Funds: 14,802,107
Capital Project Funds: 3,204,125 (1)
(1) Amounts contained herein for the Capital Project
Funds represent new appropriations for FY 2008. Unexpended FY 2007
appropriations for prior year capital projects such as park improvements,
fire stations, etc. will roll-over via Commission action (i.e. as provided
through budget resolution) into FY 2008 for the same designated projects.
Enterprise Funds: 92,733,819
Internal Service Funds: 43,071,080
Miscellaneous Trust Fund: 17,370
Total $359,506,336
As discussed above, the General Fund faced a $6 million shortfall due largely to the following factors:
Decrease in Property Tax Revenues - $2.4 million
Increase in Police & Fire Overtime - $1 million
Increase in Police & Fire Pensions - $0.84 million
Funding of Fire Salaries per Union Contract - $0.85 million
Increase in Property Insurance - $0.74 million
$2.7 million of the shortfall was due to increases mostly within the police and fire department pensions and overtime. These are union contract agreements that where adopted many years ago and are now maturing.
We knew this was coming. Tom Harris (our former City Finance Director who resigned last March, 2007) told us WE WOULD HAVE THIS ISSUE IN OUR FUTURE OUTLOOK when it was adopted back in 2004.
"Several changes to the budget were required to close the $6 million gap and balance the budget. Changes included:
Eliminated 40 positions, : Somewhere it stated that 36.6 were unfilled positions: Did we budget money for positions which were never filled or did we lose 36.6 employees over the year and not replaced them? Could this mean we didn’t really need that staff? I don’t know, I’m just asking. (Also note that the personnel expenses went up even though our number of full-time employees went down. This was due to pay increases and pensions.) For a more detailed look at what positon were cut look on pages 40 & 41.
Suspended funding of the General Employee’s Voluntary Employee Benefit Accounts (VEBA) This issue was approved before the budget had even come to the City commission. In other words, they added it as a funded issue in the budget, before they even knew what the budget projections were going to be. Thank goodness they removed it as soon as they saw they over-spent. My opponent voted "YES" to this before having a full understanding of the pending financial shortfall we knew was coming at us. Is that good decision making?
Limit Health Insurance Increases This increase is out of our hands, plus it was anticipated. I did get the impression they did not think it would be so high.
Reduced the annual Capital Funding; Look on page 189 to see if your neighborhood project is funded this year.)
Reduced Travel & Training funds ; This was an easy one to identify I believe this one came from the Budget Task Force? I 'm not sure, because those meetings were closed to the public. (Some legal hogwash about if they are only doing research they can meet in private. My question was why meet in private to begin with.)
What ALL they had they reported?
Where is their report?
Who was on that committee?
I asked to be on it as did Al Vasquez.
I would have suggested they look into other line items as well...stay tuned for more on this.
Reduced Fleet replacement funds : This cut needs to be better thought out. I must agree that the employee should not be able to take home the car, except in certain situations where an emergency vehicle used by a sworn officer may be beneficial to the residents.
However, because this privilege was abused (although they say it was part of their employment agreement) and due to a lack of a clear take-home vehicle policy, the City Commission approved a budget reduction which cuts take home vehicles. What I would have suggested is a comprehensive policy to address those times when the car is a mandatory tool for the employee and that there are provisions for privileges when earned, not just awarded.
The next 4 pages give you an excellent highlights of the larger funds.
One question kept coming up for me.
If a commissioner votes to approve a budget which is based on additional rate increases, does this mean that they voted to raise taxes? (I think so.)
I read the following statements under the subheading on page 8 & 9.
(Building Permitting Fund, Water & Sewer Fund, and Storm Water Fund)
Each area stated that the revenue projections approved in the 2007-2008 budget included "an additional rate increase to be presented to the City Commission during FY 2008." it also states that "The budget (referring to the Water and Sewer Fund) may need to be adjusted depending on City Commission action regarding rates."
This statement was made under the Outlook heading and referring to our water department revenues: "The City is considering increasing rates to cover operating deficits caused by the above items. A rate study is expected in mid year and will be presented to the City Commission for approval."
Seems to me, my opponent has already voted to increase taxes when she approved this budget.
Am I wrong here?
Read it for yourself.
Share your thoughts or perspectives with me.
I want to hear from you.
What do you think of this information?
Do you want me to continue to share these rather dry topics?
(Or should we talk about a bar’s grand opening on Clematis?)
Congratulations to all who have gotten this far...
We have just completed the Budget Message from the Finance Director Randy Sherman.
Great job Mr. Sherman...
That leaves only 305 pages to go!
Stay tuned for more on where I would cut taxes...
my suggestion will come at the end of my "Alex’s" Budget Narrative Review...
Here’s the Budget Narrative as recently posted online.
If you want to read along with me, maybe we can compare notes?
Please send me an email with your thoughts.
There’s a lot of great information here (ALL 315 pages are must read) and I encourage you all to take a peek.
For those of you who prefer cliff notes, I will try to provide the highlights.
For most of this week I will be speaking to the budget, because that’s where the story should always begin.
The Finance Department has done a superb job with clearly stating the facts.
I appreciate their professionalism, courtesy and accuracy.
Anytime I have had a question, they have responded quickly and clearly.
So where should we begin?
First a few "DID YOU KNOW" facts directly from the Budget Narrative Message
(my comments will be in red and if you read the budget as we go through this, the first excepts begin on page 3):
"The FY 2008 budget reflects the recent changes in legislative actions which required the City to roll-back taxes. Property tax revenues within the City’s General Fund decreased $2.4 million, along with expenditure increases; the City faced a $6 million shortfall."
"Property Values within the City did not increase in the double-digit range of recent years – an indication of the City’s economic condition, as well as throughout the state. ... The Property Appraiser is projecting a decline in value of 4% in existing values, which may constrain future budgets."
"The operating millage rate for FY 2008 decreased .6584 mills to 7.1916 mills. The debt service millage rate for FY 2008 is .2967 mills and funds the debt service associated with the City’s general obligation bonds. The total City millage rate for FY 2008 is 7.4883 mills, which is the lowest in almost two decades.."
Outlook :if you don’t read any other part of this report, you owe it to yourself to read the OUTLOOK (Pg. 5 & 6)
The total FY 2008 Budget for all funds is $359,506,336 with the breakdown by fund type as follows:
General Fund: $187,139,761
Special Revenue Funds: 18,538,074
Debt Service Funds: 14,802,107
Capital Project Funds: 3,204,125 (1)
(1) Amounts contained herein for the Capital Project
Funds represent new appropriations for FY 2008. Unexpended FY 2007
appropriations for prior year capital projects such as park improvements,
fire stations, etc. will roll-over via Commission action (i.e. as provided
through budget resolution) into FY 2008 for the same designated projects.
Enterprise Funds: 92,733,819
Internal Service Funds: 43,071,080
Miscellaneous Trust Fund: 17,370
Total $359,506,336
As discussed above, the General Fund faced a $6 million shortfall due largely to the following factors:
Decrease in Property Tax Revenues - $2.4 million
Increase in Police & Fire Overtime - $1 million
Increase in Police & Fire Pensions - $0.84 million
Funding of Fire Salaries per Union Contract - $0.85 million
Increase in Property Insurance - $0.74 million
$2.7 million of the shortfall was due to increases mostly within the police and fire department pensions and overtime. These are union contract agreements that where adopted many years ago and are now maturing.
We knew this was coming. Tom Harris (our former City Finance Director who resigned last March, 2007) told us WE WOULD HAVE THIS ISSUE IN OUR FUTURE OUTLOOK when it was adopted back in 2004.
"Several changes to the budget were required to close the $6 million gap and balance the budget. Changes included:
Eliminated 40 positions, : Somewhere it stated that 36.6 were unfilled positions: Did we budget money for positions which were never filled or did we lose 36.6 employees over the year and not replaced them? Could this mean we didn’t really need that staff? I don’t know, I’m just asking. (Also note that the personnel expenses went up even though our number of full-time employees went down. This was due to pay increases and pensions.) For a more detailed look at what positon were cut look on pages 40 & 41.
Suspended funding of the General Employee’s Voluntary Employee Benefit Accounts (VEBA) This issue was approved before the budget had even come to the City commission. In other words, they added it as a funded issue in the budget, before they even knew what the budget projections were going to be. Thank goodness they removed it as soon as they saw they over-spent. My opponent voted "YES" to this before having a full understanding of the pending financial shortfall we knew was coming at us. Is that good decision making?
Limit Health Insurance Increases This increase is out of our hands, plus it was anticipated. I did get the impression they did not think it would be so high.
Reduced the annual Capital Funding; Look on page 189 to see if your neighborhood project is funded this year.)
Reduced Travel & Training funds ; This was an easy one to identify I believe this one came from the Budget Task Force? I 'm not sure, because those meetings were closed to the public. (Some legal hogwash about if they are only doing research they can meet in private. My question was why meet in private to begin with.)
What ALL they had they reported?
Where is their report?
Who was on that committee?
I asked to be on it as did Al Vasquez.
I would have suggested they look into other line items as well...stay tuned for more on this.
Reduced Fleet replacement funds : This cut needs to be better thought out. I must agree that the employee should not be able to take home the car, except in certain situations where an emergency vehicle used by a sworn officer may be beneficial to the residents.
However, because this privilege was abused (although they say it was part of their employment agreement) and due to a lack of a clear take-home vehicle policy, the City Commission approved a budget reduction which cuts take home vehicles. What I would have suggested is a comprehensive policy to address those times when the car is a mandatory tool for the employee and that there are provisions for privileges when earned, not just awarded.
The next 4 pages give you an excellent highlights of the larger funds.
One question kept coming up for me.
If a commissioner votes to approve a budget which is based on additional rate increases, does this mean that they voted to raise taxes? (I think so.)
I read the following statements under the subheading on page 8 & 9.
(Building Permitting Fund, Water & Sewer Fund, and Storm Water Fund)
Each area stated that the revenue projections approved in the 2007-2008 budget included "an additional rate increase to be presented to the City Commission during FY 2008." it also states that "The budget (referring to the Water and Sewer Fund) may need to be adjusted depending on City Commission action regarding rates."
This statement was made under the Outlook heading and referring to our water department revenues: "The City is considering increasing rates to cover operating deficits caused by the above items. A rate study is expected in mid year and will be presented to the City Commission for approval."
Seems to me, my opponent has already voted to increase taxes when she approved this budget.
Am I wrong here?
Read it for yourself.
Share your thoughts or perspectives with me.
I want to hear from you.
What do you think of this information?
Do you want me to continue to share these rather dry topics?
(Or should we talk about a bar’s grand opening on Clematis?)
Congratulations to all who have gotten this far...
We have just completed the Budget Message from the Finance Director Randy Sherman.
Great job Mr. Sherman...
That leaves only 305 pages to go!
Stay tuned for more on where I would cut taxes...
my suggestion will come at the end of my "Alex’s" Budget Narrative Review...
Sunday, January 20, 2008
A DAY OF REST...
Have a glorious Sunday.
Jump on a bike, go for a walk, or simply sit in your backyard and read a good book.
We are blessed to live in this wonderful weather.
Let’s cherish the good!
Me? I have a race to win... consider me in high alert! I will be reading the City's Fiscal Year 2007/08 Budget Narrative recently posted online.
How did I find myself here?
...reading dry financials on a glorious Sunday morning?
Well it started in 1999, when I entered the arena of city government by running for City Commission District 3. At that time our block was the furthest north boundary to what is now Commissioner Kimberly Mitchell’s district. While I was considering a second jab at the seat,(then held by Mary Brandenburg) redistricting was in progress. The census had just been released and it was the “elected officials” who determined the new boundary lines. Before I could say “I’m in this race” I was forced out of the race when the boundary was shifted one street south, removing me from challenging Commissioner Brandenburg. I don't have to tell you who moved the line do I?
It was a taste of politics which spoke volumes to the “political process”. In hindsight, it was a twofold blessing. First, Kimberly Mitchell entered that race and eventually won against all odds, unseating the incumbent. (Political pundits will always claim that it is near impossible to unseat incumbent, I’ll explain later why.) The second reason, I have now come to believe, was a fortunate turn for me. It strengthened my resolve to represent the community. My desire to serve became more imbedded in my heart as I saw a need for full engagement in our City.
Since then I have remained actively engaged in issues regarding all parts of the City. My regular appearance at almost all public meetings earned me the respect of our current Mayor, when she announced at a large gathering in the Cuillo Theater, that she "didn’t know anyone who attended as many meetings as Alex Vizoso Saylor." That’s me. A regular meeting going watchdog… yes, I am part of what Mayor Frankel refers to as the peanut gallery. Is that a compliment?
So I am loaded with all this information to share, on things I have heard, actions I have witnessed and behaviors inappropriate to leaders; which I have had to personally bear, along with others.
So here on this blog, I share my experiences with you the stakeholders of our City.
What you decide to do with these words and information is up to you.
So have a glorious Sunday.
Jump on a bike, go for a walk, or simply sit in your backyard and read a good book.
We are blessed to live in this wonderful weather.
Let’s cherish the good!
I have a Budget Narrative to read...I think I will read it outside.
Jump on a bike, go for a walk, or simply sit in your backyard and read a good book.
We are blessed to live in this wonderful weather.
Let’s cherish the good!
Me? I have a race to win... consider me in high alert! I will be reading the City's Fiscal Year 2007/08 Budget Narrative recently posted online.
How did I find myself here?
...reading dry financials on a glorious Sunday morning?
Well it started in 1999, when I entered the arena of city government by running for City Commission District 3. At that time our block was the furthest north boundary to what is now Commissioner Kimberly Mitchell’s district. While I was considering a second jab at the seat,(then held by Mary Brandenburg) redistricting was in progress. The census had just been released and it was the “elected officials” who determined the new boundary lines. Before I could say “I’m in this race” I was forced out of the race when the boundary was shifted one street south, removing me from challenging Commissioner Brandenburg. I don't have to tell you who moved the line do I?
It was a taste of politics which spoke volumes to the “political process”. In hindsight, it was a twofold blessing. First, Kimberly Mitchell entered that race and eventually won against all odds, unseating the incumbent. (Political pundits will always claim that it is near impossible to unseat incumbent, I’ll explain later why.) The second reason, I have now come to believe, was a fortunate turn for me. It strengthened my resolve to represent the community. My desire to serve became more imbedded in my heart as I saw a need for full engagement in our City.
Since then I have remained actively engaged in issues regarding all parts of the City. My regular appearance at almost all public meetings earned me the respect of our current Mayor, when she announced at a large gathering in the Cuillo Theater, that she "didn’t know anyone who attended as many meetings as Alex Vizoso Saylor." That’s me. A regular meeting going watchdog… yes, I am part of what Mayor Frankel refers to as the peanut gallery. Is that a compliment?
So I am loaded with all this information to share, on things I have heard, actions I have witnessed and behaviors inappropriate to leaders; which I have had to personally bear, along with others.
So here on this blog, I share my experiences with you the stakeholders of our City.
What you decide to do with these words and information is up to you.
So have a glorious Sunday.
Jump on a bike, go for a walk, or simply sit in your backyard and read a good book.
We are blessed to live in this wonderful weather.
Let’s cherish the good!
I have a Budget Narrative to read...I think I will read it outside.
Saturday, January 19, 2008
NEW BIKE PATH! Clear Lake Community Meeting
This meeting has been called by the City, except I only received it today through a forward email from someone in the Downtown.
Thank you for sharing!
JANUARY 31st, 5:30pm
(nice to see they are thinking about the public on this meeting time.)
at City Commission Chambers.
RSVP to 822-1435 or astelly@wpb.org
I believe this is important to us ALL,
not just the downtown residents.
JANUARY 31st, 5:30pm
(nice to see they are thinking about the public on this meeting time.)
at City Commission Chambers.
RSVP to 822-1435 or astelly@wpb.org
I believe this is important to us ALL,
not just the downtown residents.
This issue regards a bike path, which has already come before the City Commission, to connect Okeechobee to Banyan. I was at that meeting when it was addressed. The idea is based on providing a good alternative transportation source for bicycling. The only problem is, I feel it ignores a few common sense issues.
Here are a few thoughts to ponder:
- There is a neighborhood on the north side of Banyan, Progressive Northwest Neighborhood, who definately would be best served by a connecting bike path to Downtown. To begin this project on the south end (which I think least needs it) seems a bit silly.
- The intersection they want to connect to (Okeechobee and Australian) is scary, even in a car. How is the City going to provide the needed safety elements required for cyclist at such a dangerous intersection?
- This bike path would wonderfully serve the new condos on Australian, except the residents will have to cross Australian to use it. I fail to see the benefit.
I love to ride my bicycle.
As a matter of fact many of you have seen me on my bike. I intend on riding my bicycle around to deliver some of my campaign signs. (Any one who wants to join me can sign up on my volunteer page.) I have also been known to ride my bike to coffee gatherings being hosted around town as well.
Recently, at the Northend Mayor's meeting held last Wednesday, I asked questions regarding bicycles. I was wondering if they were considering bike riders in their redevelopment efforts. (I was told yes, that they had plans for bike racks and a proposed designated bike lane.) I asked this question because I want to encourage a proactive attitude and direction about making our City fully accessible (and safe) to ALL cyclist.
The Downtown Development Authority has a very knowledgeable cyclist on staff named Raphael Clemente. I would hope they ask him for opinions regarding all cycling issues.
Please attend this meeting if you ride your bike in the City and let them know your thoughts and desires about travel paths through our City.Oh, by the way... can anyone tell me what the significance is of the flag on the tree?
I always related skull and crossbones to pirates.
Am I wrong?
Friday, January 18, 2008
Residents of West Palm Beach Do Care for the Homeless...
On February 8th a very special kind of fundraiser will take place in our Meyer Amphitheater on Flagler Drive.
The Lord’s Place, which has been servicing the Palm Beaches for many years will be sponsoring a ----
SleepOut -- SleepIn -- Pig Out!
The idea is: To increase awareness of what it’s like to be homeless and to raise money for the programs of The Lord’s Place whose mission is: to break the cycle of homelessness by providing innovative, compassionate and effective services to men, women and children in our community.
I personally think it’s a creative way to bring awareness and involvement.
The fee/donation is $40.00 unless it’s a group of 8 or more, then its $20.00.
If any of you reading this want to form a group, we can do so through my web site.
I am happy to organize a group if I receive 8 or more interested emails from the community. I have 2 right now, my husband and myself. Join us in demonstrating that we do care about even the lesser of us. Coantact me if you are interested in participating: alex@alexhearsme.com
Here is the informational flyer with the entire event described in detail.
TLP Sleep-out fact sheet 08.doc
Let’s sit under the stars of West Palm Beach and share fellowship for a good cause.
The Lord’s Place, which has been servicing the Palm Beaches for many years will be sponsoring a ----
SleepOut -- SleepIn -- Pig Out!
The idea is: To increase awareness of what it’s like to be homeless and to raise money for the programs of The Lord’s Place whose mission is: to break the cycle of homelessness by providing innovative, compassionate and effective services to men, women and children in our community.
I personally think it’s a creative way to bring awareness and involvement.
The fee/donation is $40.00 unless it’s a group of 8 or more, then its $20.00.
If any of you reading this want to form a group, we can do so through my web site.
I am happy to organize a group if I receive 8 or more interested emails from the community. I have 2 right now, my husband and myself. Join us in demonstrating that we do care about even the lesser of us. Coantact me if you are interested in participating: alex@alexhearsme.com
Here is the informational flyer with the entire event described in detail.
TLP Sleep-out fact sheet 08.doc
Let’s sit under the stars of West Palm Beach and share fellowship for a good cause.
Thursday, January 17, 2008
Suggestions for residents experiencing problems...
The Mayor recently announced a HOTLINE for non-emergancy issues.
Let’s use it: 822-2222
Please let me know what kind of response you get.
Also, it may be in your best interest, if you are one of the homes repairing pipes, to keep your corroded pipes. (Besides, you never know when a piece of pipe might come in handy...)
My email is alex@alexhearsme.com.
I want to HEAR from you...
Let’s use it: 822-2222
Please let me know what kind of response you get.
Also, it may be in your best interest, if you are one of the homes repairing pipes, to keep your corroded pipes. (Besides, you never know when a piece of pipe might come in handy...)
My email is alex@alexhearsme.com.
I want to HEAR from you...
MORE ABOUT PINHOLE LEAKS...
I received this email and feel compelled to share it...
South end Homeowner:
Thursday, January 17, 2008 3:04:02 PM
I went by my house at noon to see how the $1800 plumbing re-do was going. I had a nice surprise in my mailbox. My $627 water bill arrived. The last few months my bill has been between $200 and $300. I understand the city forgives one water bill every five years if there is a leak or some other problem. However, the leakage of water at my house will actually be reflected in two water bills — the bill I just received and the next one. I became aware of the first leak two weeks ago. By allowing forgiveness of more than one bill (since it’s the city’s fault,) they could help out the average middle-income person who is struggling to pay for plumbing repairs plus the large water bill.I don’t know how much it is going to cost to fix my driveway where it was cut open in order to reach the pipes. It’s unsightly and unsafe and will have to be repaired by a paving contractor.Thanks for caring about this. What a nightmare.
READ FOR YOURSELF WHAT HAS BEEN DOCUMENTED:
The following are links to information pertaining to pinhole leaks in copper pipes:
ToolBase Services is the housing industry's resource for technical information on building products, materials, new technologies, business management, and housing systems.
http://www.toolbase.org/about.aspx
The Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission (WSSC)
http://www.wssc.dst.md.us/copperpipe/pinhole_charts.cfm
Senate Bill 54 mandated "Task force study report on pinhole leaks" completed by the Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development.
Click here to view the report
South end Homeowner:
Thursday, January 17, 2008 3:04:02 PM
I went by my house at noon to see how the $1800 plumbing re-do was going. I had a nice surprise in my mailbox. My $627 water bill arrived. The last few months my bill has been between $200 and $300. I understand the city forgives one water bill every five years if there is a leak or some other problem. However, the leakage of water at my house will actually be reflected in two water bills — the bill I just received and the next one. I became aware of the first leak two weeks ago. By allowing forgiveness of more than one bill (since it’s the city’s fault,) they could help out the average middle-income person who is struggling to pay for plumbing repairs plus the large water bill.I don’t know how much it is going to cost to fix my driveway where it was cut open in order to reach the pipes. It’s unsightly and unsafe and will have to be repaired by a paving contractor.Thanks for caring about this. What a nightmare.
READ FOR YOURSELF WHAT HAS BEEN DOCUMENTED:
The following are links to information pertaining to pinhole leaks in copper pipes:
ToolBase Services is the housing industry's resource for technical information on building products, materials, new technologies, business management, and housing systems.
http://www.toolbase.org/about.aspx
The Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission (WSSC)
http://www.wssc.dst.md.us/copperpipe/pinhole_charts.cfm
Senate Bill 54 mandated "Task force study report on pinhole leaks" completed by the Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development.
Click here to view the report
WATER PIPE ALERT!!!
The problem is bigger then we are being told...
The south end historic neighborhoods' pipes are bursting.
Plumbers who service West Palm Beach are all very busy addressing calls.
Some say that what they think will be a simple call for service, is actually taking days to address.
Families are paying in the thousands of dollars for repairs to stop the leaks.
Be proactive now and check your systems.
Here is one suggestion to check if you have leaks:
Turn off all the water sources in your home,
then go outside and see if your meter’s dial is still turning.
If it is, you have a leak.
Another suggestion is to go online and check the history of your water bills.
https://onestopshop.wpbgov.com/utilities/default.asp
If you see an unreasonable increase without any change in your usage, you might have a problem.
You may be able to avert a serious rupture if you catch it early.
You will still need to locate the leak and make the repairs, but it will stop external damage to walls or ceilings if it were to burst.
Good luck West Palm Beach residents.
Share this with your neighbor.
(and if you see a plumbing truck on your block, go find out if that's the problem.)
The water crisis is now in our walls as well as our drinking glass.
And they (City Hall) want us to stay optimistic?
The south end historic neighborhoods' pipes are bursting.
Plumbers who service West Palm Beach are all very busy addressing calls.
Some say that what they think will be a simple call for service, is actually taking days to address.
Families are paying in the thousands of dollars for repairs to stop the leaks.
Be proactive now and check your systems.
Here is one suggestion to check if you have leaks:
Turn off all the water sources in your home,
then go outside and see if your meter’s dial is still turning.
If it is, you have a leak.
Another suggestion is to go online and check the history of your water bills.
https://onestopshop.wpbgov.com/utilities/default.asp
If you see an unreasonable increase without any change in your usage, you might have a problem.
You may be able to avert a serious rupture if you catch it early.
You will still need to locate the leak and make the repairs, but it will stop external damage to walls or ceilings if it were to burst.
Good luck West Palm Beach residents.
Share this with your neighbor.
(and if you see a plumbing truck on your block, go find out if that's the problem.)
The water crisis is now in our walls as well as our drinking glass.
And they (City Hall) want us to stay optimistic?
Still MORE about the water...
The situation is getting worse for homeowners with copper pipes.
That would generally be older homes in the eastern communities.
I started hearing about "Swiss cheese" pipes due to excessive chlorine levels back in November.
Many of the homes in the north end began experiencing leaks, then bursting from breaks.
The rash of plumbing issues were always due to corroding copper pipes.
A retired plumber who lives in the north end spoke to me about his daughter’s water pipes and stated that in his 30 years as a plumber, he knew chlorine corrosion when he saw it.
He coined the phrase "Swiss Cheese" corrosion because he explained that it starts as leaks in small pin holes which then get bigger and bigger. Eventually the holes meet and the pipes burst.
Well, it seems that across the "pond", the Town of Palm Beach residents are experiencing the same issues. Remember... they buy water from the City.
Click here: Leaks in copper water pipes reported by more Palm Beach and West Palm residents, businesses
Personally, I prefer Jarlsberg...and no chlorine in my water please...
That would generally be older homes in the eastern communities.
I started hearing about "Swiss cheese" pipes due to excessive chlorine levels back in November.
Many of the homes in the north end began experiencing leaks, then bursting from breaks.
The rash of plumbing issues were always due to corroding copper pipes.
A retired plumber who lives in the north end spoke to me about his daughter’s water pipes and stated that in his 30 years as a plumber, he knew chlorine corrosion when he saw it.
He coined the phrase "Swiss Cheese" corrosion because he explained that it starts as leaks in small pin holes which then get bigger and bigger. Eventually the holes meet and the pipes burst.
Well, it seems that across the "pond", the Town of Palm Beach residents are experiencing the same issues. Remember... they buy water from the City.
Click here: Leaks in copper water pipes reported by more Palm Beach and West Palm residents, businesses
Personally, I prefer Jarlsberg...and no chlorine in my water please...
Wednesday, January 16, 2008
Glad I didn't miss the Riverwalk Board Meeting regarding Roebuck Road!
It was a last minute call which alerted me to a meeting called for the Riverwalk Board regarding Roebuck Road Extension. I dropped all other engagements to attend.
Why is it important for an east coast resident of West Palm Beach?
Why would I travel 25 minutes out to the west for an issue about a road in their backyard?
Because, the road will be at the very edge of our water catchment area which affects ALL OF US!
THAT"S RIGHT! It's our drinking water they are playing with!
If you haven’t been informed yet, we have a "situation" with our water supply, and since the "quality" of water hasn’t been, shall we say pleasant , we should all chime in on this "project".
What situation am I referring to?
Well, the issue is a long standing one, which has receive the cursory political attention, but no real resolution, except, as County Commissioner Jeff Koons stated last night, "We pushed the road back as per the agreement of the surrounding communities".
There are current, funded, in the works planning and design, to build a road extention for the residents who live in the acreage, abutting our water catchment area.
Thank you Mr. Koons for pushing the road further into our water basin area. Now we can really rest assured that a possiblity of a potential traffic accidentof a truck carrying gasoline or chemicals will surely give us our own "Valdez" experience.
In today’s environmentally sensitive times, it would seem that leadership should dictate logic, not politics. But as Commissioner Koons shared his wisdom with the group of 50+ residents: "This is a political process and a POLITICAL APPROACH is needed."
Really?
Okay, then what should we poor voters do?
I have a suggestion...vote out the politicians who are not taking this situation to the next level.
County Commissioner Koons admits that "Water is like gold and access is very valuable".
Okay.
That’s a start.
City Commissioner Geri Muoio said: "The City is meeting with 5 environmental agencies and needs the community to get involved."
Okay.
That’s at least an effort.
George Webb (Palm Beach County Engineer) stated: "This (building roads over environmentally sensitive lands) is not unusual for us. We know its environmentally sensitive."
Really?
Okay then...
Why are we still moving forward at the speed of a fast moving train?
This was the reason given:
During a workshop to fund the project (which wasn’t even on the list) Royal Palm Beach residents lobbied the county Commission so that they (RPB) could have a reliever road out of the acreage.
All the elected officials present agreed:
"There’s a lesson here for all of you in Riverwalk, get active."
Funny... I have always seen Riverwalk as a very ACTIVE and ENGAGED community.
Haven’t they been bringing attention to this issue for years?
One resident even shared last night that they have been vocal for 11 years.
But credit goes to City Commissioner Muoio who made the statement:
"Community WATCHDOGS are very important to the process."
(Thank you for that acknowledgment. I should know because that’s what I’ve been doing for the last 9 years. I appreciate the acknowledged valued of my service.)
(Oh by the way, and here’s a news alert.
A bit of information shared, which drew gasp from the audience:
There are an additional 2,000 new homes now approved for development that we need to accommodate.)
So why are we asking the same elected officials who approved development plans (probably with variances and waivers) to help us now with the problems they created?
Back to (as stated by our elected officials) why we MUST move forward with the Roebuck Road extension:
County Commissioner Koons: "It’s a policy decision made by the board..." ... the board you sit on Mr. Koons? Aren’t you a voting member of that body?
City Commissioner Muoio: "Its not Commissioner Koons fault or Mr. Webb’s. They (I think she was referring to the County Commissioners) were lobbied by Royal Palm Beach."
George Webb (County Road Engineer): "There’s a proposed connection to Persimmon Road. "
Okay then...we understand the history,
we know the "stated" positions of our elected representatives,
and we see what the realities are before us...
so tell us now...
what are you going to do about it?
City Commissioner Muoio: Meetings with environmental agencies and requests for an environmental study, not an assessment...
County Commissioner Koons: Meetings, meetings and more meetings have occured, he said. But don’t fear residents...he is going to facilitate an air boat ride for his fellow county commissioners through the water catchment area... (no comment...although I could have a lot of fun with that statement!)
(Please help yourself to fun reading or scroll down past the italics to the rest of my reporting of last night's show...the following is from a document which was sent by County Commissioner Koons in a Newsletter to a constituent.)
Why is it important for an east coast resident of West Palm Beach?
Why would I travel 25 minutes out to the west for an issue about a road in their backyard?
Because, the road will be at the very edge of our water catchment area which affects ALL OF US!
THAT"S RIGHT! It's our drinking water they are playing with!
If you haven’t been informed yet, we have a "situation" with our water supply, and since the "quality" of water hasn’t been, shall we say pleasant , we should all chime in on this "project".
What situation am I referring to?
Well, the issue is a long standing one, which has receive the cursory political attention, but no real resolution, except, as County Commissioner Jeff Koons stated last night, "We pushed the road back as per the agreement of the surrounding communities".
There are current, funded, in the works planning and design, to build a road extention for the residents who live in the acreage, abutting our water catchment area.
Thank you Mr. Koons for pushing the road further into our water basin area. Now we can really rest assured that a possiblity of a potential traffic accidentof a truck carrying gasoline or chemicals will surely give us our own "Valdez" experience.
In today’s environmentally sensitive times, it would seem that leadership should dictate logic, not politics. But as Commissioner Koons shared his wisdom with the group of 50+ residents: "This is a political process and a POLITICAL APPROACH is needed."
Really?
Okay, then what should we poor voters do?
I have a suggestion...vote out the politicians who are not taking this situation to the next level.
County Commissioner Koons admits that "Water is like gold and access is very valuable".
Okay.
That’s a start.
City Commissioner Geri Muoio said: "The City is meeting with 5 environmental agencies and needs the community to get involved."
Okay.
That’s at least an effort.
George Webb (Palm Beach County Engineer) stated: "This (building roads over environmentally sensitive lands) is not unusual for us. We know its environmentally sensitive."
Really?
Okay then...
Why are we still moving forward at the speed of a fast moving train?
This was the reason given:
During a workshop to fund the project (which wasn’t even on the list) Royal Palm Beach residents lobbied the county Commission so that they (RPB) could have a reliever road out of the acreage.
All the elected officials present agreed:
"There’s a lesson here for all of you in Riverwalk, get active."
Funny... I have always seen Riverwalk as a very ACTIVE and ENGAGED community.
Haven’t they been bringing attention to this issue for years?
One resident even shared last night that they have been vocal for 11 years.
But credit goes to City Commissioner Muoio who made the statement:
"Community WATCHDOGS are very important to the process."
(Thank you for that acknowledgment. I should know because that’s what I’ve been doing for the last 9 years. I appreciate the acknowledged valued of my service.)
(Oh by the way, and here’s a news alert.
A bit of information shared, which drew gasp from the audience:
There are an additional 2,000 new homes now approved for development that we need to accommodate.)
So why are we asking the same elected officials who approved development plans (probably with variances and waivers) to help us now with the problems they created?
Back to (as stated by our elected officials) why we MUST move forward with the Roebuck Road extension:
County Commissioner Koons: "It’s a policy decision made by the board..." ... the board you sit on Mr. Koons? Aren’t you a voting member of that body?
City Commissioner Muoio: "Its not Commissioner Koons fault or Mr. Webb’s. They (I think she was referring to the County Commissioners) were lobbied by Royal Palm Beach."
George Webb (County Road Engineer): "There’s a proposed connection to Persimmon Road. "
Okay then...we understand the history,
we know the "stated" positions of our elected representatives,
and we see what the realities are before us...
so tell us now...
what are you going to do about it?
City Commissioner Muoio: Meetings with environmental agencies and requests for an environmental study, not an assessment...
County Commissioner Koons: Meetings, meetings and more meetings have occured, he said. But don’t fear residents...he is going to facilitate an air boat ride for his fellow county commissioners through the water catchment area... (no comment...although I could have a lot of fun with that statement!)
(Please help yourself to fun reading or scroll down past the italics to the rest of my reporting of last night's show...the following is from a document which was sent by County Commissioner Koons in a Newsletter to a constituent.)
Our Tallahassee Top Ten
By Commissioner Jeff Koons
The 2008
Florida Legislative Session gets underway the first week in March, and with more
state-mandated cuts in property tax revenue looming this year, our lobbying
efforts in Tallahassee will be more important than ever. County staff has
identified 44 legislative priorities, appropriation requests and support issues
that I hope state lawmakers will support.
Our number one priority is a
funding request of $3.5 million for the Lake Region Water Treatment Plant. It is
absolutely crucial that we get this state-of-the-art reverse-osmosis facility up
and running to replace obsolete municipal water treatment plants in the Glades.
The County facility will draw from the Floridan Aquifer rather than Lake
Okeechobee, freeing up surface water supply for restoration of the Everglades
and producing up to 10 million gallons per day of high quality drinking water
for thousands of residents.
Number two will be the elimination of unfunded
state mandates and cost shifts. With local tax revenues being reduced, it is
unreasonable to force local governments to operate some state programs without
any state funding. In recent years, we’ve had to shell out $4.2 million to
create and operate the Regional Transportation Authority and $4.8 million for
Juvenile Justice pretrial disposition. These are state programs that the state
should be paying for.
The number three priority is elimination of a
particularly sneaky cost shift that siphons locally raised communications tax
revenue and gives it to fiscally-constrained counties elsewhere. It may seem
altruistic for wealthier counties to assist poorer ones. But this measure also
takes money from municipalities such as Belle Glade, Pahokee and South Bay that
are in worse financial shape than the counties they subsidize. The Legislature
must find a less crippling alternative revenue source for needy counties.
We will be seeking environmental
funding for the Lake Worth Lagoon Partnership Grant Program ($5.25 million),
beach and inlet management projects ($7.29 million), and the Chain of Lakes
restoration ($1.5 million).
Transportation will get a lot of attention this
session, as well. We’re requesting a total of $20 million to widen Beeline
Highway and Congress Avenue and extend State Road 7 north into The Acreage --
three state road projects that Palm Beach County has agreed to do in order to
expedite the process.
Rounding out our top 10 list are
requests of $1.9 million for a new DMV building, $400,000 for the Juvenile
Assessment Center and $350,000 for the Glades Region Agricultural Program.
One new issue this year is a legislative request to require private
insurance companies to cover essential autism treatment for children. Such
treatments are covered by Medicaid and the Department of Children and Families,
but only for those who are indigent or have filed bankruptcy.
As always, I
welcome your comments and questions. Please feel free to contact me or my staff
at 355-2202.So where did it all end last night?
The saddest statement (which was meant as a joke, but is no laughing matter) was when the suggestion was made that perhaps someday the road might be named "Koons Blvd."Now let me speak seriously to those who have made it through to the end of this post:
I hope I speak for you...I know I speak for myself, so here is my voice...
I am dead serious when I say that it's not only about the noise or the "in my backyard" issues that affect Riverwalk residents.Its about what’s in our drinking glass.
Its about our water supply.
Its about our health.
More importantly, it about our future generations and how we protect them today with logical decisions.
Enough meetings!
Enough pandering!
We demand action!
I appreciate that the Mayor has taken a pro-active stance (As my opponent stated last night to the audience: "On my way out here, the Mayor called me to tell me... she’s with you guys.").I believe that her intention is to see this extension stopped. However, she is a political force and Commissioner Koons told us last night "it’s a political process". So I need to ask the question: Is there something going on here we don't know, regarding the process? Some of you may think this is a low blow, but when Commissioner Koons closed the meeting last night, he closed it with an endorsement of the Commissioner who I am challenging...I ask that you be the judge.
As for the environmental study, I believe it may be moot or too late, but let's do it anyway.It just may be a political action to say they are doing something or it just may be their best idea...
I SAY, NOT GOOD ENOUGH.
So what would be my best idea?
We all have bosses.
For elected officials it’s the VOTING public.
For governmental entities there is a chain of command.
So I say, take it to the next level.
Take it to the Governor's office.
This is a vital health and safety issue for hundreds and thousands of residents in Palm Beach County. (Remember, they already know it's an environmentally sensitive area, but maybe an air boat ride will reaffirm that.)
The higher powers of government can and must intervene.
We need to take this to someone who can stop this plan.
It’s a bad plan. Logic shows us that.
And in government, nothing is done until its done...like a new city hall.If the political leaders believe, as commissioner Koons stated, that this is a "political process", then they must take the "political process" to the next level.
So should we.
Vote for new ideas and leadership, March 11th.If they haven’t gotten us there yet, then when...the clock is ticking and our water is in danger.
So that’s my idea.
Change the law, and the plan, from Tallahassee... because I don’t think they hear us here.(please refer to these links for more information which relates indirectly to Roebuck Road concerning the State Road 7 extention.)
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
FINALLY! ...PUBLIC COMMENT...
Sorry, its 11:00pm.
The public went home!
No public comment this week...except for a fire union member who spoke to a fire department legal issue.
My public comment on the meeting is on at the 349:00 minute mark...check it out if you want to know my position.
The public went home!
No public comment this week...except for a fire union member who spoke to a fire department legal issue.
My public comment on the meeting is on at the 349:00 minute mark...check it out if you want to know my position.
CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT PRESENTATION
WOW!
This meeting should be witnessed from start to finish by every resident in West Palm Beach.
I know I'm dreaming when I hope for such an interest in something as dry as plan review processing, but let me say this:
The presentation was well presented (thank you staff),
clearly explained (thank you staff)
and very (shall I say) enlightening...
Check it out!
(Warning: Its over 4 hours long!)
http://tv.cityofwpb.com/mediasite/viewer/FrontEnd/Front.aspx?&shouldResize=False
Please watch at least the last hour and a half (start it at the 256:00 minute marker)... that's the most interesting part!
I am sad for our City!
Do they even know in the end what they voted on?
I'm still not sure.
I have requested a copy of the changed and altered resolution... or was it changed?
I'm not sure...
But wait!
We still have City Commission Public Comment coming up...
This meeting should be witnessed from start to finish by every resident in West Palm Beach.
I know I'm dreaming when I hope for such an interest in something as dry as plan review processing, but let me say this:
The presentation was well presented (thank you staff),
clearly explained (thank you staff)
and very (shall I say) enlightening...
Check it out!
(Warning: Its over 4 hours long!)
http://tv.cityofwpb.com/mediasite/viewer/FrontEnd/Front.aspx?&shouldResize=False
Please watch at least the last hour and a half (start it at the 256:00 minute marker)... that's the most interesting part!
I am sad for our City!
Do they even know in the end what they voted on?
I'm still not sure.
I have requested a copy of the changed and altered resolution... or was it changed?
I'm not sure...
But wait!
We still have City Commission Public Comment coming up...
Still waiting for Public Comment?
Guess what?
You'll have to wait.
There's a CONSTRUCTION SERVICES TIME CERTAIN PRESENTATION AT 5:30PM.
Sorry Public, you can't comment yet.
You'll have to wait until this presentation is done.
Have a seat, it will prove to be very enlightening...
You'll have to wait.
There's a CONSTRUCTION SERVICES TIME CERTAIN PRESENTATION AT 5:30PM.
Sorry Public, you can't comment yet.
You'll have to wait until this presentation is done.
Have a seat, it will prove to be very enlightening...
City Commission Meeting , January 14, 2008
FYI: Pass/Fail Agenda link below:
http://www.cityofwpb.com/meetings/agenda/cc-08-01-14-Commission_Meeting_PassslashFail_Agenda_January_14comma_2008.pdf
This would have otherwise been a short meeting if it had not been for 2 members of the public who facilitated the need for dialogue on the dais. Thank goodness for City Watchdogs!
Two issues of importance came forward:
one south end related,
one north end related.
The south end issue: (Item 26) Pertained to a dock approval near Summa Beach.
It was thankfully tabled until photographs could be provided to clearly indicate where exactly it was going to be built. South end should pay close attention to this one. Thank you Gail Levine for raising the flag on this one and Commissioner Mitchell for insisting on more information.
The north end issue: (Item 27) Barcelona Square is now an apartment building with 265 units, with portions reaching eight stories.
If you want to know more, email me.
The vote was 4-1 for approval.
A special note to my neighbors and friends in the north end:
Remember Neil Kosokoff?
He is no longer the owner of this project and the development has been significantly altered.
The new developers are Lane Development out of Tampa.
The name of the development is Barcelona Square Limited Partnership.
Just thought you might want to know...
So now for Public comment...
NO, not yet...we have a presentation scheduled for 5:00pm...Kaleidoscope 2008.
Okay, after that, we will here from the public...maybe!
http://www.cityofwpb.com/meetings/agenda/cc-08-01-14-Commission_Meeting_PassslashFail_Agenda_January_14comma_2008.pdf
This would have otherwise been a short meeting if it had not been for 2 members of the public who facilitated the need for dialogue on the dais. Thank goodness for City Watchdogs!
Two issues of importance came forward:
one south end related,
one north end related.
The south end issue: (Item 26) Pertained to a dock approval near Summa Beach.
It was thankfully tabled until photographs could be provided to clearly indicate where exactly it was going to be built. South end should pay close attention to this one. Thank you Gail Levine for raising the flag on this one and Commissioner Mitchell for insisting on more information.
The north end issue: (Item 27) Barcelona Square is now an apartment building with 265 units, with portions reaching eight stories.
If you want to know more, email me.
The vote was 4-1 for approval.
A special note to my neighbors and friends in the north end:
Remember Neil Kosokoff?
He is no longer the owner of this project and the development has been significantly altered.
The new developers are Lane Development out of Tampa.
The name of the development is Barcelona Square Limited Partnership.
Just thought you might want to know...
So now for Public comment...
NO, not yet...we have a presentation scheduled for 5:00pm...Kaleidoscope 2008.
Okay, after that, we will here from the public...maybe!
CRA Meeting... January 14, 2008 City Commission Chambers
The CRA meeting primarily consisted of a report made by both the Downtown Development Authority "DDA" ( http://www.westpalmbeachdda.com/) and the both the Downtown Community Redeveolpement Agency "CRA" (now referred to as the City Center CRA, and Northwood/Pleasant City CRA Districts.)
Here is the link to the agenda including the PASS/ FAIL notes.
http://www.cityofwpb.com/meetings/agenda/cr-08-01-14-CRA_Meeting_PassslashFail_Agenda_January_14comma_2008.pdf
The presentation primarily addressed the efforts being made by each agency to attract retail and attractions to the CRA district. The tools being used consist mostly of grants and loans to new and existing business. The dollar amounts, both of City dollars invested and private investment dollars was interesting, as well as, a valuable tool for measuring the return on our tax dollar investment. The DDA and CRA are primarily funded by tax dollars. Equally interesting were the numerous programs available for businesses seeking assistance.
Here is the link to the agenda including the PASS/ FAIL notes.
http://www.cityofwpb.com/meetings/agenda/cr-08-01-14-CRA_Meeting_PassslashFail_Agenda_January_14comma_2008.pdf
The presentation primarily addressed the efforts being made by each agency to attract retail and attractions to the CRA district. The tools being used consist mostly of grants and loans to new and existing business. The dollar amounts, both of City dollars invested and private investment dollars was interesting, as well as, a valuable tool for measuring the return on our tax dollar investment. The DDA and CRA are primarily funded by tax dollars. Equally interesting were the numerous programs available for businesses seeking assistance.
I kept asking myself the following 2 questions:
- How are they sharing the information with the public regarding these available dollars (grants & loans) ? The comment was made that it was mostly word of mouth. Have any of you been told that there are funds available as start-up capital or that there exist a 6 month rent subsidy for new businesses downtown? I think it’s a valuable piece of information that should be share throughout the City. Don’t you?
- If the same partnerships were created within neighborhood associations, that exist downtown, wouldn’t we the residents (who ultimately are the consumers for these business, be able to create synergies of improvements in our communities?) Aside from the neighborhood grants of $5,000.00 which are available for qualified associations, wouldn’t an effort to improve our residential streets with well co-ordinated programs also assist us? Hmmm...
- Where’s the larger financial report on the bonds, taxing funds and City revenues? As a Board, the CRA members should be looking this over regularly. There are many dollars changing hands and a clear picture is essential to establishing its highest and best use. I would be asking for a financial report at every meeting. We do it on every other board I have sat on. Why not this one? Just a thought...
This meeting rolled right into the City Commission Meeting which started at 3:00pm...
Remember, public comment?
Public Comment isn't until 5:00pm when the business portion of the meeting is over...stay tuned...
So much to share... and pass on!
Yesterday was a long day if you were a City Commissioner (or Mayor) of the City of West Palm Beach. The meeting calendar began at 1:30pm with a presentation from the CRA, then moved right into the City Commission Meeting (which continues to begin at 3:00pm over objections of the public), which then entered the 5:00 o’clock hour, at which point it has typically been stated that Public Comment (remarks from the general public) are heard. Except for yesterday, when a presentation of Kaleidoscope Event (http://www.wpb.org/kaleidoscope/) filling the room with children and proud parents.
It really was a beautiful site to see so many organizations represented in the City’s effort to celebrate diversity. I was a member on the committee which developed the Kaleidoscope Event in 1999 and 2000. It won accolades at the International Festivals & Events Association, Gold Pinnacle Award in the category of "Best Educational Program" for the years 1998, 1999 and 2000. I have watched it grow and am very proud of the participation and empowerment it provides our youth through partnerships with clubs, organizations and schools. I strongly urge the community to attend this event January 27th from 10:00am - 5:00pm, on Flagler behind the Library. Come out and see your tax dollars at work helping children find creative ways to contribute to society.But I digress...back to public comment...
well, not yet ... first let me share about the CRA meeting...
Monday, January 14, 2008
I am stepping up...please stand up with me.
On January 7th, 2008, at 2:00pm, I signed an Oath of Candidacy to place myself on the ballot as a choice for our community come March 11th , 2008. I am taking my advocacy to the next level of service.
I do this as a service to the City I have called home for 44 years.
This is my hometown.
I love this City.
The reason I love the City isn’t because of the weather, I could get the same climate in other towns surrounding us; its because of the people. The residents, specifically my neighbors, both close by and far away, are amazing citizens. We have fought together, celebrated together, cried together and lived together, all the time realizing that unless we remain together in our desire for good governance and leadership, we will fall apart.
I have enjoyed being a watchdog for our City.
I hope now I can be a service dog as your commissioner.
I can promise you this... I will not be a lap dog, ever.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
